Four E’s of Public Readings

Karens picWith less than one week before my first public reading, I panic. Oh sure, I’ve read at writers workshops, but other writers expect flat expressionless words and concentrate on the print. I usually flub a few words, stumble along internally editing as I read and neglect any attention to how I sound. I’m a terrible reader, and now I’m subjecting an innocent and unsuspecting audience not only to my words but also my reading.

My story of 1500 words takes almost fifteen minutes to read aloud. Ten minutes is the ideal length according to Randy Susan Meyer of the Huffington Post in “Ten Tips for Writers Reading in Public.”  Now if I could channel my inner George Saunders, I might finish in five minutes. He races through the audio recordings of his stories in the Tenth of December.  His reading pace creates “excitement” which is one of the goals for writers reading in public.

Meyer recommends to either “entertain, enlighten, excite, engage” and always smile. From the four E’s, I decide to “engage” the audience. Eye contact is the key. And if I remember to smile, that’s an added bonus.

Now comes the tough part – practicing. I find an old copy of my story with critique comments. My writing group’s questions, comments and quandary float in the margins of my hardcopy. The comments are my target list of places to add extra emphasis and accomplish the equivalent of saying, “Don’t miss this. It’s important.”

I underline words and mark places for voice inflection. My story becomes a musical score with crescendos and decrescendos. I add a few staccatos and mark the tempo changes fast and slow.

My biggest struggle is conveying changes in speakers – the ones without attribution tags. In print, a reader can see the carriage return to the next line. My solutions include moving a non-verbal action by the speaker to the beginning of the sentence, pausing before changing speakers, and varying the rate of speech for each character.

I draw on what I learned at previous jobs. Big companies with hordes of human relations people — scheduling training every time you stand from your desk to fetch a cup of coffee — develop employees with twenty-first century skills, such as presenting and communicating. I benefit from years of presentations and public speaking classes.

Thank you HR. I love you and take back all the mean things I said

about your training programs. You made me a better person.

I know how to stand and where to look. Practice eliminates little distractions, such as turning or flipping pages. My pages are in a leather binder to prevent my shaking hands from spoiling the illusion that I know what I’m doing.

Writer’s Relief, “Open Mike Night: Ten Tips For Reading Your Writing In Public,” provides useful tips: arrive early, use a big font, and dress professionally. As a writer, however, I want to know how early, how big and what is considered a writer’s professional clothes. Will I have a podium to set my notes?  Or will I stand alone behind a microphone?  I choose slacks and heels and rock the “I just left the office thirty minutes ago” look.

My preparation includes watching videos of accomplished writers at public readings. I’m fascinated by Sherman Alexie. Critics call him a stand-up comic. He writes. He jokes. He makes films. He entertains.

Karens second picWriters Relief also advises what appears to be obvious. “Maintain an audible volume.”  At my reading, my personal cheering section sits beside me. When another writer stands to read, one of my cheerleaders whispers, “Read louder and slower than that.”

Thanks to my pre-worries and research, my nervousness disappears when I begin reading. I make eye contact and people smile at me. At one point in the reading, I notice the room is silent and listening. This wonderful audience cares about my crazy made-up characters. They laugh at the right spots and respond with thunderous applause. Thank you, gracious audience. Then, I remember to smile.

Tags: Public readings, Randy Susan Meyers, Huffington Post, Writer’s Relief, George Saunders, Sherman Alexie

9 comments

Skip to comment form

    • Barbara Pattee on February 24, 2016 at 9:23 pm
    • Reply

    Standing in front of a group of adults to deliver a speech is daunting. Try standing in front of a group of teenagers in a class they have no interest in. Even more daunting.

    • Robert Jannasch on July 15, 2015 at 2:19 pm
    • Reply

    This is a lot of fun, and you are so right that one must prepare for such a reading. You know that Woodrow Wilson prepared his frail voice for his train-stop speeches by reading aloud in the woods. If you happen to live by the woods, you can step out and shout your message until it comes naturally, or at least until the nearest neighbor shouts back that you can “shut the front door.”
    .
    With reference to arriving early, I think one should arrive early enough to reach and endure boredom. After that, public reading, or even public lashes, should strike you as a more interesting activity.
    .
    Finally, I shall make note of Meyer’s 4 e’s, and I want to add e5 through e7. The following e’s especially please me. They are exaggerate, exasperate, and enrage. These are often used.
    Exaggerate is bested evidenced in the not so old adage of “Dude, it was awesome!” Was it really awesome? Perhaps it was just hyperbole. “We are adrift in a sea of hyperbole.” But there is something exciting about massive quantities of anything.
    Exasperate is best accomplished when one breaks the subject matter into smaller and smaller pieces where even the best American mind cannot go hither. After losing them, one returns to pick them up and the audience is overjoyed because they have reconnected. Don’t wait too long to reconnect.
    Enrage by telling them what they do not want to hear. Then, go back and offset the entire tirade with a one sentence statement. Make it a quick thing, and don’t forget the histrionics.
    .
    After reading all of this, you might think that I think that I know what I’m talking about, but I don’t.

      • Karen on July 16, 2015 at 3:57 pm
      • Reply

      Thanks, Robert, your additional E’s would be a worthy writing experiment. The writer, Graham Moore, accomplished enrage with the harsh treatment of the protagonist in the award winning Imitation Games. Any nominees for exaggerate and exasperate?

    • Kelly Bixby on July 14, 2015 at 10:27 pm
    • Reply

    Congratulations, Karen. It must have been an honor to have been asked to share your writing at the author’s reception. I’m glad your nerves calmed down and the audience responded well. Thanks for all the tips!

      • Karen Kittrell on July 15, 2015 at 1:23 pm
      • Reply

      Thanks Kelly. I experience all the emotions before the actual events.

    • Sue Remisiewicz on July 12, 2015 at 5:33 pm
    • Reply

    Great information! Where did you do your reading?

      • Karen Kittrell on July 13, 2015 at 2:38 pm
      • Reply

      Thanks, Sue. The judges of Short on Words asked four authors to read at the author’s reception. The youth division had four pieces read also.

    • Claire Murray on July 8, 2015 at 4:54 pm
    • Reply

    Very heartwarming experience. I enjoyed reading about it.

      • Karen Kittrell on July 11, 2015 at 7:45 pm
      • Reply

      Thanks Claire. It’s nice to have a happy ending.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.